Name-calling in debates is the oldest trick in the book
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f8f8/5f8f86db7ece9e668eb0026b93eb4a386214b0e7" alt=""
In public forums, debates have this tendency to escalate into pissing contests once someone resorts to name-calling. Calling your opponent stupid, an idiot or a moron is a sign that you are getting frustrated. Frustration in public forums is easy enough to detect when people start using name-calling. Those who use this tactic do not seem to realize that they are the ones who look like morons.
Before you call someone a moron, you need proof that he is. Ask yourself the following questions:
1. Did your opponent hurt/offend himself or other people as a result of what he said.
2. Did your opponent waste resources/time/money?
3. Did your opponent say something that is libelous?
If the answer to all of the above is no, then your opponent is not a moron. If the answer to any of the questions is yes, then he is a moron.
In any debate, the person who label's
ReplyDeletethe other party loses credibility so
goes whether right or wrong in its
deliberate use; hence, backfires to
the originator as doubtful.
In the case of Noynoy Aquino, calling him a moron is not name calling. It is called describing.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 1:
ReplyDeleteYou got it right!
Anonymous 2:
You got a point. Plus PNoy doesn't engage in debates anyway, which automatically makes him a...
:)