'Fake news' should be defined properly first before it can be made a topic of debate



As far as I'm aware there's no such thing as "fake news" to private bloggers. "Fake news," it seems is just a fancy buzzword idiots use to describe propaganda. How can we even consider articles released by private bloggers as news or "fake" news if:

1. They are not a media conglomerate dedicated to publishing straight news;
2. They have obvious biases;
3. They don't even practice journalism.

However, what we can consider as "fake news" are articles released by self-professed news establishments that have wrong information or information that were purposely misconstruing to promote a certain agenda.

Take Rappler for example. Remember the fiasco with Resorts World and how the idiotic Ressa kept on spinning it as an ISIS- backed attack?

Or how about the recent brouhaha about a certain Global Impunity Index where the Philippines was a leader of which turned out to be from 2014?

Exactly.

----------------------------
Ronn Zantua as posted on Facebook.


Comments

Popular this week

An open letter to CNN on their reporting on the #YolandaPH disaster in the Philippines

Reporters Karen Lema and Manuel Mogato of @Reuters LIED about the Duterte "Hitler" quote

Jose Rizal never had Tagalog in mind when he encouraged us to love our own language

How the 1986 'people power revolution' was engineered by the United States