GRPundit

What it reads (clockwise, from upper left): ABS-CBN twists/manipulates news; the masses are entertained.  It is owned by the...Lopez family who is greatly indebted to...Cory Aquino who is the mother of...Noynoy Aquino SWS and Pulse-Asia Surverys : Surveys that are biased (are released) to give the impression of opinion of the majority.  Discreetly commisioned by the...Communications Group that reports to...Noynoy Aquino Internet Army : Paint a squeaky-clean image of Noynoy on the internet.  Silence all critics.  Controlled by the...Communications Group that reports to...Noynoy Aquino Media People: Journalists/authors being paid or benefiting from the government.  Blatantly on the payroll of the...Communications Group that reports to...Noynoy Aquino Print : The truth is suppressed.  Is indebted to Cory Aquino or on the payroll of the...Communications Group that reports to...Noynoy Aquino   Akbayan, Gabriela, and other "Leftist...

Check out Conrado de Quiros's latest Inquirer.net column : P-Noy has just cemented his position as the best speaker among all the postwar presidents. Including Magsaysay, including Marcos, including Erap. He doesn’t go for bombast, he goes for heart-to-heart. And with it manages to hold the attention of an audience for a long period of time. Last Monday’s Sona was as long as it got—I myself felt it was too long. But I didn’t see anyone, including stalwarts of the opposition, yawning his mouth off. Maybe they were looking for things to criticize, as P-Noy himself suggested they were wired to do. But they were listening. That is no small feat. Any comment from Senator Bongbong Marcos?

Conrado " Noynoy is Aragorn " de Quiros is obviously not a sportsman at heart. He keeps score of the rulings of what he describes as a Philippine Supreme Court made up of "Arroyo's Justices" and notes the current score is 19-0 in favour of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. De Quiros is shittin' bricks as he regards this score. He then goes around stomping his feet in a tantrum spitting rubber bullets about how things must be this or things should be that. Here is a example of some items in his quaint wishlist of things that ought to be in the la-la world of his little mind from his latest piece on the Inquirer.net : " reason is more powerful than the Court " " historical experience is more powerful than the Court " " common sense is more powerful than the Court " He then goes to the "point" he wanted to make -- that current SC Chief Justice Renato Corona ought to "resign from the Court as a matter of ...

True to form, Inquirer.net "columnist" Conrado " Noynoy-is-Aragorn " de Quiros is at it again building an entire emo plea on the back of that feature of politics Aquinoists have exploited to smithereens -- popularity . Coming from an "article" that goes by the quaintly poetic cliche, " How the mighty have fallen ", the following is classic de Quiros... This country may be forgetful in the long run, but it does have a strong short-term memory. You see that in the wellspring of support P-Noy has gotten for his decision to stop the former First Couple from leaving. The anger and loathing are still there. The people want the former first couple punished. The people want the former first couple jailed. As I said in an earlier piece, criminal prosecution is not a popularity contest . The process of criminal prosecution is not one that is driven by a popular outcome. It proceeds on the basis of a rigorous examination of facts and an intelligent tying ...

The venerable Conrado " Noynoy is Aragorn " de Quiros huffs and puffs in his recent Inquirer.net article Two trying to lead us to believe that the real "issue" surrounding the constitutional crisis that is flaring up in the aftermath of the Philippines' Justice Secretary Leila De Lima baldly defying the orders of the Supreme Court (SC) to suspend her travel ban on former President Gloria Arroyo is really all about the right of SC chief justice Renator Corona to sit in the office he currenly holds. Consider for a moment that (1) there is nothing in the Law that barred Arroyo's appointment of Corona and (2) de Quiros's position was argued on the quaint basis of " delicadeza ". After considering that, suppose, for argument's sake that de Quiros's laboured point in his article is worth considering. The question then to ask is this: Which is the bigger crime, still ? De Lima's defiance of a Supreme Court order? Or Corona's being ...